Christian SLASHER
Sep. 24th, 2006 10:08 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, I got an odd email, so it's off to ranty land for me. After all, I'm not going to all this work just to send it off to one person. The email asked if I had "seen the light" since my slash is slowing down and I’m starting to write more het/gen (Necessary Evil, my Firefly Jayne/River, Shadows of the Past).
I sat and stared at the email in a little bit of shock. First, I'm exploring other characters, and so that may or may not lead to het/gen writing. Second, I don't have to "see the light" because I am Christian and I am a slash writer and I am okay with being both at once. Before you go casting those stones, I really want to talk about the soul searching I did when I first decided I couldn't "fake" being straight. I really had to consider how my faith and my sexuality "fit."
The Story of Sodom and Gomorrah
Let's start with the biggie: Sodom and Gomorrah. The Lord did say of the men of Sodom and Gomorrah, "their sin is very grave." So, what were they doing? They were raping and committing adultery and ignoring the Lord (all sins pretty much worthy of hell and brim fire without homosexuality being involved at all).
Besides, I refuse to take that story as a moral on how to live a moral and virtuous life. The hero of that particular story was Lot, a man who, in order to save two strangers from being raped by the crowd, offers his "two daughters who have never slept with a man." Sweet. The crowd's refusal saves his daughters, but this is not a man I care to emulate. Then again, he later sleeps with both his daughters. Yes, in the Biblical story, his daughters get him drunk, but if he is sober enough to get it up and impregnate not one but two women in a night, he's sober enough to know the women are his daughters.
Direct Biblical Condemnation of Homosexuality
So, what about Corinthians and Romans where the bible says "homosexual offenders" will not inherit the kingdom of God and condemns the act? Well, I might be more impressed if not for the translation difficulty. One bible translates that same line as "those who use and abuse each other, use and abuse sex" another as "nor abusers of themselves with mankind" Now, even assuming that I accept the translation as being specific to homosexuality, I still don't take this as the ultimate argument.
See, the Bible bans a lot of different activities. Leviticus says that a man who touches "carcasses of unclean wild animals or of unclean livestock" is guilty and must be condemned, even if he did not realize the beast was unclean. The Bible specifically bans eating camel, rabbit, pig, and rock badger because they do not have "a split hoof completely divided and [chew] the cud." The Bible even requires circumcision to show faithfulness.
I take these Biblical condemnations (which are not part of the 10 Commandments or one of Jesus' teachings) as practical protections since people back then didn't understand how disease spread from a carcass or how to avoid the worms in pork and circumcision avoided infections in people without regular access to water. I do not believe that you go to hell for touching a carcass accidentally or eating pork or for having a foreskin. The condemnation of homosexuality strikes me as very similar. The anal canal simply doesn't have the immune system protections of the vagina, and so there is a greater chance of disease UNLESS a person knows how to reduce that risk. Yep, the condom. So, just like pork was once danger and banned, homosexuality was once dangerous and banned. That time is gone.
My Writings
So, I have no problem sending Blair to a monastery where he reads Proverbs, talks to a monk about God, and decides to go back to Jim's arms (Finding Home). I find nothing irreligious about homosexuality or heterosexuality or bisexuality. Sure, I don't have many of my characters going to church, largely because none of the characters I use are big church-goers, but I am perfectly comfortable being a Christian slash writer. Get over it.
So, will I write gen and het stories? Sure. I actually have a weird little Xander/Harmony bunny that keeps chewing on my shoes. Will I write slash? Yep. I consider Learning Curve and Trickster open universes, and the Spangel bunny I didn't get to this summer is in the corner sulking and glaring at me.
If you don't like that or if you think that makes me evil, GO AWAY. Oh, and why were you reading me in the first place?
I sat and stared at the email in a little bit of shock. First, I'm exploring other characters, and so that may or may not lead to het/gen writing. Second, I don't have to "see the light" because I am Christian and I am a slash writer and I am okay with being both at once. Before you go casting those stones, I really want to talk about the soul searching I did when I first decided I couldn't "fake" being straight. I really had to consider how my faith and my sexuality "fit."
The Story of Sodom and Gomorrah
Let's start with the biggie: Sodom and Gomorrah. The Lord did say of the men of Sodom and Gomorrah, "their sin is very grave." So, what were they doing? They were raping and committing adultery and ignoring the Lord (all sins pretty much worthy of hell and brim fire without homosexuality being involved at all).
Besides, I refuse to take that story as a moral on how to live a moral and virtuous life. The hero of that particular story was Lot, a man who, in order to save two strangers from being raped by the crowd, offers his "two daughters who have never slept with a man." Sweet. The crowd's refusal saves his daughters, but this is not a man I care to emulate. Then again, he later sleeps with both his daughters. Yes, in the Biblical story, his daughters get him drunk, but if he is sober enough to get it up and impregnate not one but two women in a night, he's sober enough to know the women are his daughters.
Direct Biblical Condemnation of Homosexuality
So, what about Corinthians and Romans where the bible says "homosexual offenders" will not inherit the kingdom of God and condemns the act? Well, I might be more impressed if not for the translation difficulty. One bible translates that same line as "those who use and abuse each other, use and abuse sex" another as "nor abusers of themselves with mankind" Now, even assuming that I accept the translation as being specific to homosexuality, I still don't take this as the ultimate argument.
See, the Bible bans a lot of different activities. Leviticus says that a man who touches "carcasses of unclean wild animals or of unclean livestock" is guilty and must be condemned, even if he did not realize the beast was unclean. The Bible specifically bans eating camel, rabbit, pig, and rock badger because they do not have "a split hoof completely divided and [chew] the cud." The Bible even requires circumcision to show faithfulness.
I take these Biblical condemnations (which are not part of the 10 Commandments or one of Jesus' teachings) as practical protections since people back then didn't understand how disease spread from a carcass or how to avoid the worms in pork and circumcision avoided infections in people without regular access to water. I do not believe that you go to hell for touching a carcass accidentally or eating pork or for having a foreskin. The condemnation of homosexuality strikes me as very similar. The anal canal simply doesn't have the immune system protections of the vagina, and so there is a greater chance of disease UNLESS a person knows how to reduce that risk. Yep, the condom. So, just like pork was once danger and banned, homosexuality was once dangerous and banned. That time is gone.
My Writings
So, I have no problem sending Blair to a monastery where he reads Proverbs, talks to a monk about God, and decides to go back to Jim's arms (Finding Home). I find nothing irreligious about homosexuality or heterosexuality or bisexuality. Sure, I don't have many of my characters going to church, largely because none of the characters I use are big church-goers, but I am perfectly comfortable being a Christian slash writer. Get over it.
So, will I write gen and het stories? Sure. I actually have a weird little Xander/Harmony bunny that keeps chewing on my shoes. Will I write slash? Yep. I consider Learning Curve and Trickster open universes, and the Spangel bunny I didn't get to this summer is in the corner sulking and glaring at me.
If you don't like that or if you think that makes me evil, GO AWAY. Oh, and why were you reading me in the first place?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 05:21 pm (UTC)Julia, and what do the gospels say about homosexuality: nothing. A whole lot about tending to ones own lack of charity, though
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 05:41 pm (UTC)Of course, Jesus tripped himself up on a little joke; when he talked about looking upon a woman with lust in your mind he underestimated the ability of most people to deny that they do things like that.
Julia, it's like the last chapter of Job, when God delivers the smack-down to everyone who thinks they know how he goes about things; most people think he's excepting their own position from that general condemnation of error.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 05:33 pm (UTC)Meself, I have long been very comfortable with my identity as a bisexual atheist with pagan leanings, who also writes slash. So if anyone tries to save me, it's far too late, and they should save their breath! :-D
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 05:33 pm (UTC)I studied the history or religion and women's history and a lot of other things and it left me unable to really embrace formal religion. I can take a distant enjoyment, but the problem is that men wrote the bible and men are fallable.
Jesus did not hate men or women based upon their choices. Neither did any of the other great teachers.
I don't understand the argument that you can't write slash or read it and be a good Christian.
I think you can be a good person and not embrace dogma while still embracing the message.
You are right about dietary laws. That's exactly why so many exist. Also the be fruitful and multiply het message was because so many children died. You had to have a lot of kids back then or your family would die out.
The other reason why gay love was looked down on by the church fathers was because Romans were more tolerant of it. And Romans were the oppressors.
Ironically, though Romans were very family orientated and were the patriarchal model that is seen as the norm today.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 06:27 pm (UTC)As the daughter of a retired pentacostal preacher, I so agree with your points here. I love the example of Lot. He is always held up as a righteous man, but he was really horrible.
The Bible is flawed. It was written by men and translated by men who all had their own faults and could easily sway the words to fit their own beliefs.
I always want to tell people like this, "I don't write this to convert you. This is for fun. If you don't like, go away and stop trying to convert me. It's not going to work."
Excellently said. You made my day.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 06:28 pm (UTC)I'm proud to know you. I myself am agnostic/wiccan. But I respect your views.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 06:35 pm (UTC)When God created the world, He wanted man to populate it, and quick...Ecclesiastes states that man's purpose on the planet is to worship God...therefore, no people, no worship...in many ways, that is why any sexual deviance (including masterbation and withdrawal for birth control *see the story of Tamar, Judah, and Onan for that one*) were considered sinful because they were misusing the direct purpose of the sexual act--populating the world...
Now we are overpopulated, and it continues...
And something that my great-uncles used to preach (they were both ministers) is that the reason why we no longer make sacrifices to God or follow dietary laws/hygiene laws as laid down in Leviticus was because when Christ was crucified, His sacrifice made all those other laws null and void...we therefore do not follow those laws because they are no longer in effect...otherwise we would still be taking a paddle to dig a hole outside of the city limits, defecating, and covering same with the paddle to prevent disease (thank God for flush toilets, I say)...
To condemn homosexuality because the Old Testament condemned it is to follow an outdated law that has no further bearing on the world today...not only does our world suffer from overpopulation, it also has famine, evil in the guise of religious leadership, and more problems that the Bible does not cover...
Homosexuality is present in many forms in all life, including plant life and the animal kingdom...not just in humans...
And, if you're interested, look up the Gaia Theory...scientists have proposed that the world is like a living organism and mankind is similar to a virus...to keep itself alive and functional, the planet has begun to mutate our genetics to 'protect' itself, much like the immune system of the human body...the easiest way to mutate? promote relationships that are physically unable to reproduce, thus decreasing the population slowly but surely...and how to do that? homosexuality, pure and simple...monogamous homosexuals are unable to reproduce, thus reducing the burden of overpopulation and easing the burden of the 'virus' of the human race on the planet...
just some thoughts to add to the pot and cook it a little bit...maybe a religio-scientific stew...
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 08:48 pm (UTC)As for homosexuality to control population, I think it could partially help. The best way to control population is for more people to be sterile. My partner and I are planning on having children, so we don't fit the model for reducing population. In fact, she wants 8 kids! I talked her down to 4 though, lol. A lot of homosexuals do want kids so they either adopt, give birth temselves, or have a surrogate mother. It's a great idea, but homosexuality alone won't decrease the population.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 05:40 am (UTC)Yeaho the same problem after the flood. That's when the so called Noahide laws went into effect.
Hmmm, A couple of other points too. Adam and Eve had two sons, who then had kids, who did they mate with? Their sisters? Incest city, man! There are people who will argue that that was before the commandments so it wasn't a sin then, buttttt.
A lot of christians run around talking about how they hate the Devil, but there's not one word in the Book that says God hates Lucifer. In fact Lucifer boldly walked into heaven and had an argument with God over Job.
One has to stop and ponder things like that. Including the fact that David was a womanizer and committed adultery, then had the woman's husband killed because he got her pregnant and was trying to cover it up. He was supposed to be the apple of God's eye.
I don't think I would have liked the apostle Paul too much. He didn't seem to like women or have a lot of respect for them. Sigh. Oh well.
The way I look at it is this. I have to account to God for what I do. Not for what everyone else does. It's not my business to mind someone else's soul, it's my business to mind my own and I have enough trouble tending to mine to try to tend everyone else's too. It's too bad a lot of christians think that forgiven means perfect and therefore they have a right to tend your conscience and your soul for you. I think Jesus said it best.
"Why are you trying to pull the splinter out of your brother's eye when you have a log sticking out of your own. Go get the log out of your own eye first."(Paraphrased)
"Those who haven't sinned, cast the first stone." (Paraphrased)
Heeee, a lot of people can't seem to figure out what that means:)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 05:53 am (UTC)Lucifer actually means bringer of light...he was the most beloved angel of God and He favored him above all of His other angels...so much so that it's the reason that Lucifer believed that he was equal with God and actually tried to take over Heaven...
When God had to cast him out of Heaven to maintain the peace, it truly broke His heart to lose his favorite angel...
And Paul...Paul was misogynistic to the extreme, plus there have even been theories that he himself was gay...there's a part in the NT (don't remember where) when he talks about the weakness of the flesh--that particular phrase was usually used when they were talking about homosexuality...and he was using it to describe his own situation...
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 06:36 pm (UTC)The dietary restrictions seem to be a matter of health and hygiene. It was potentially fatal to eat pork and shellfish when they couldn't be properly refrigerated. Salmonella is not pretty.
The sexual guidelines? Animal intestine skin was once used as a condom but it was far from safe. Things have moved on a great deal since then.
Circumcision is performed as a matter of course in children in hot climates, including Australia, which is an essentially Christian society. Again, a matter of health considerations.
That it was incorporated into religious tenets must have seemed sensible at the time but the time has gone, in view of the fact that most people now bathe every day and indoor bathrooms are the norm.
In short, that email was well-meaning but so silly it's hard to comprehend. Your choices and preferences are as valid as anyone else's.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 07:03 pm (UTC)I feel more fortunate every day. Not only did the church I attended as a child welcome gays (and everyone else), there was even a gay couple who were ministers and filled in for the regular pastor from time to time. I was well into my teens before I realized people thought there was something wrong with gay people. Far too old to ever learn how to understand such things!
Gabrielle
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 07:29 pm (UTC)I agree with you completely, and everyone who said that all the translations very well probably changed what the Bible originally said.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 08:08 pm (UTC)And though there are millions of intelligent, kind-hearted and empathic Christians like you, somehow the few that validate that quote are always the loudest.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 08:18 pm (UTC)Basically all my babble means thank you for being much more articulate than me.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 09:22 pm (UTC)And I am on the same page with you, Christian slash reader(I haven't the talent to write it).
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 09:24 pm (UTC)I fully agree with you on Leviticus. As for Corinthians, you have to remember context. Corinth was an extremely cosmopolitan center with hundreds of temples, many of them populated with temple prostitutes of both genders. Sexual sin was a big deal for Paul and I think one reason it was so emphasised in these letters was because people were partying at the temples with their pagan friends then seeing no problem with coming to worship as Christians. You can't be both. You can worship in pagan temples or you can worship as a Christian.
Homosexuality was a very common practice in the Roman Empire during Jesus lifetime, yet He never mentions it at all. I find that significant.
I eagerly await you being able to read my slash story. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 10:31 pm (UTC)And I totally agree with your disclaimer: "Don't like...Don't read." When did common sense go out of fashion?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 11:40 pm (UTC)I think Mother Theresa said it best."If you judge people, you have no time to love them.”
I am also church leadership.
So, the many stupid things heard, make most of us cringe and wonder who this person thinks they have to defend or sell.
As in any thought or heart lifestyle.The people that make the most fuss are usually the ones who know and/or understand the very least.
People will find what they look for good or bad. Personally I choose to look for the good in everyone I meet, and hopefully they will see the same in me.
"Have you seen the light" indeed, wonder if they ever were to meet the Lord face to face, would they know Him or block His way into their church.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-24 11:54 pm (UTC)I have a hard time believing God would not want me happy.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 03:09 am (UTC)My conccern for myself has always been less the homosexual nature of the stories and more the amount of time I spend reading them instead of getting other things accomplished... I'm well and truly addicted!
*waiting out the evil Xander/Harmony bunny hoping for more slash*
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 07:47 am (UTC)Your post came at a good time to remind me that yeah, it's okay. I should probably pay better attention during church, though :)
And what a relief to know that others are in the same shoes we are!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 08:11 pm (UTC)That's just too freakin' funny! Had me laughing my head off. Thanks :D
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 09:08 pm (UTC)Sorry I didn't mean to get all philosophical, you continue to write what your muse dictates and let others natter to themselves. We're all here waiting to see what you come up with next - slash, het, gen - it's the good writing that counts, not the slant of the story and we all know you have that talen in spades.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 05:45 am (UTC)